top of page

![Azure Project 19 Pty Ltd v 5 Point Projects Pty Ltd [2026] QSC 96](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6dc908_706dd904bea744b3b59235619b0f7585~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_333,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/6dc908_706dd904bea744b3b59235619b0f7585~mv2.webp)
![Azure Project 19 Pty Ltd v 5 Point Projects Pty Ltd [2026] QSC 96](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6dc908_706dd904bea744b3b59235619b0f7585~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_448,h_336,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/6dc908_706dd904bea744b3b59235619b0f7585~mv2.webp)
Azure Project 19 Pty Ltd v 5 Point Projects Pty Ltd [2026] QSC 96
Supreme Court of Queensland Kelly J Case Analysis A. OVERVIEW Azure Project 19 Pty Ltd v 5 Point Projects Pty Ltd [2026] QSC 96 is a significant Queensland security of payment decision concerning the extent to which an adjudicator must consider and apply contractual provisions when assessing liquidated damages. The Supreme Court held that the adjudicator committed jurisdictional error by allowing a liquidated damages deduction based on an apparent concession without properly

Shady Mikhail
Sep 285 min read
bottom of page
